We come across a lot of situations in implant treatment.
In such a situation, it is producing good results with pre-existing instruments, and it may be controversial whether other instruments are necessary. But I wanted to come up with a solution to minimize this controversy, in an area that’s most embarrassing for clinicians, among many of those situations.
The way I want to go is very clear. The situation of having to make a bone called GBR, the part associated with the maxillary sinus and the soft tissue graft from the upper & lower anterior region, and the treatment of broken screws and peri-implantitis that occur a few years after prosthesis delivery, is still changing little by little.
The big stem of treatment doesn’t change, but the applications of the details need to be clearer, simpler, and more predictable. There is nothing new under the sky.
But what’s important is that I want to go to the clinical end goal of making it easy for clinicians to use by aggregating a lot of pervasive concepts and techniques.In this two-day symposium,